Gilles Arnaud Bailly vs Kylian Collignon Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Recent performance on second serve highlights that Bailly has a slightly lower win percentage at 39.23%, when compared to Collignon's 40.11%. Could this minor edge indicate a potential advantage for Collignon?
• In return games, Bailly's recent form has them winning 44.6% of points off opponents' second serves. Collignon leads slightly here with 45.35%. On first serve returns, Collignon again appears stronger with 32.2% over Bailly's 28.83%.
• When under pressure, saving breakpoints, Bailly manages to save 46.39%, while Collignon is a bit more adept at 48.21%. Does this suggest a higher resilience under pressure from Collignon?
• Overall match performance over the last year leans towards Bailly, who has won 62.69% of their matches, compared to Collignon's 47.17%.
• Considering surface familiarity, Bailly excels on Hard courts, with a 69% win rate. In contrast, Collignon performs best on Indoor Hard courts at 57%.
• Player level analysis shows Bailly frequently competes in and wins 62.5% of matches at lower-tier tournaments, while Collignon's win rate remains steady at 47.17%.
• Bailly has faced opponents with an average ranking of 364.63, suggesting potentially easier matchups than Collignon, whose opponents average a ranking of 136.75.
• If the match reaches a deciding set, Collignon's 56% win rate in such situations surpasses Bailly’s 46%.
• When converting break points, Bailly has recently succeeded 38.37% of the time, somewhat higher than Collignon's 32.5%.

Editorial Prediction (June 19, 2025, UTC):

In analyzing the current form and historical match statistics, several factors favor both players, yet some are more decisive than others. Collignon demonstrates a marginal advantage in second serve performance and break point saving ability, indicating resilience under pressure, which is critical in determining match outcomes.

However, overall match win percentage and proficiency on hard surfaces heavily favor Bailly. These are crucial indicators of overall strength and potential match dominance, especially on the preferred surface.

The analysis of player level and opponent quality suggests that Collignon has faced stiffer competition, which may have honed their game sharpness, although Bailly's consistent performance against lower-ranked players cannot be discounted.

Considering all the factors, including higher break point conversion and surface performance, Bailly is predicted to be the likely winner of this upcoming tennis match.